
Actually it's a tie for first in the Cutest Puppeh category with her brother Argi and sister Kim, but don't tell them (or Zouzou) that.
CyberMarker 1.0

A nurse appeared and told us that after we had seen Dominique the doctors would want to talk with us. She said that no one but immediate family would be allowed in, and asked us to show identification. They were afraid the press would try to pass themselves off as members of the family. She warned us that it would be a shock to look at her, that we should be prepared.
I worried about Lenny and looked over at her. She closed her eyes, bowed her head, and took a deep breath. I watched her will strength into herself, through some inner spiritual force, in a moment so intensely private that I dared not, even later, question her about it. Of the four of us, she was the strongest when we entered the room.
Under the awesome headline, "Tucker Max's Movie: Poop," Gawker's Hamilton Nolan reviews I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, the trailer for which we previously discussed here. And the film is so unconscionably horrible that HamNo can't/won't/doesn't even try to make his review funny.Honestly, if someone challenged you to come up with a more douchebaggy name, could you possibly top Tucker Max?? [Huh-huh, I said "top Tucker Max"!! Yes I did.]
It's just. that. grim.
Doug Murphy, 41, the owner of the venerable Castro gay bar Moby Dick, died of the H1N1 (swine flu) virus while visiting Palm Springs on Friday.This just sucks on so many levels:
He developed a thick skin and learned to leave the heat of the argument on the Senate floor. That's how Kennedy learned to move past that day in 1991 when, during the debate over the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court, his good friend Orrin Hatch appeared to summon up the Great Unmentionable. "Anybody who believes that," said Hatch, "I know a bridge up in Massachusetts that I'll be happy to sell to them."Oh, right, you vile prick, of course you hadn't meant it. Gawd. His "good friend"?? Such a good friend. Fucking liar.
To this day, Hatch maintains that any connection between his wisecrack and Chappaquiddick was unintentional. "I was really mortified," says Hatch. "A lot of my supporters loved it, and when I said I hadn't meant it, it drained some of the charm, some of the glory, out of it."
A Children’s Treasury Of Insane Old People That Zeke Emanuel Should Euthanize, In Dallasthe photos and Wonkette's delicious (in this case) snark will make you want to serve on a Death Panel ASAP.
The Washington Post today quotes an "anonymous White House official" excoriating what he condescendingly calls "the left of the left" for petulantly demanding a "public option." That article notes that the Obama White House is surprised by the intensity of progressives' insistence that the bill include a "public option," and who can blame them for being surprised? Ordinarily, progressives are told that they cannot have what they want because Blue Dogs and Republicans (on behalf of the industries that own them) must get what they want, and progressives meekly accept that because it's "better than nothing" (don't let the Perfect be the Enemy of the Good, they are lectured). More than anything else, it's vital that this dynamic change. Such a change -- a shift in Beltway power dynamics -- would be far more consequential even than the specific health care policy issues at stake in this debate.On that note, let this be the zillionth blog to celebrate Barney Frank's delicious smackdown and pwnage of a simpering WingnutBot who asked him why he continued to support a "Nazi policy".
The CEO of Whole Foods is not allowed to have a different opinion from you on a national domestic policy issue? Rilly?(Did she just say/write "Rilly"?!? Maybe it's generational, but I find myself
. . .
Here's why boycotts don't work: the vast majority of customers don't care. And yes, that includes the vast majority of Whole Foods customers, a surprising number of whom drive SUVs and even--I swear!--occasionally vote Republican. Now consider the demographic that cares enough about health care to actually boycott a company over it. Most of them are a) wonks or b) political activists. The latter group is disproportionately young and does not spend a great deal of money on groceries. The former group is tiny.
You may get a large number of people who say they'll boycott Whole Foods. But then when they're out of extra-virgin olive oil and the Safeway doesn't have organic, and the nearest Trader Joes is a twenty-five minute drive away through traffic--they'll shop at Whole Foods. Three weeks later, they'll have managed to forget that they ever intended to stop shopping at Whole Foods.
I’ve heard that some are boycotting Whole Foods in response to a Wall Street Journal opinion article wherein John Mackey suggested alternatives to President Obama’s proposed healthcare overhaul.Echo Chamber thanks Jim for being its first Guest Blogger, and for his excellent contribution.
Let me say that although I don’t agree with all that Mr. Mackey proposes and I do take umbrage with his use of Margaret Thatcher’s quote about “socialism” as if what is being proposed is analogous to that that, I think a boycott is neither warranted nor justified.
Despite my disagreement with most of his alternatives, he is a self-avowed libertarian and therefore none of what he suggests should be surprising. In fact, some of his ideas do have merit.
I agree that health savings accounts (HSAs) could be expanded and that restrictions on the interstate sale of insurance stifles competition and could create greater competition if removed. I also believe transparency is important and all of these things should be given consideration.
However, I believe he misses the mark on most accounts because he lacks an understanding of the breadth of the problem that MOST Americans face and he has blind faith in market forces to solve every problem that plagues our society. It’s for that reason I disagree with his one sided approach.
I’m a firm believer in government of the people, by the people and for the people. When Barack Obama was elected and majorities were won in both the Congress and Senate, my will was expressed and so was the will of a majority of Americans. I believe that government has a role in securing our rights, freedoms and security which includes to “promote the general welfare”’.
When market forces do not or cannot accomplish this, government should play a role in ensuring the welfare of its citizens.
As FDR famously articulated in 1941 in his Four Freedoms speech, “freedom from fear” should be regarded as a fundamental right of all free people and yet, there are few greater fears in life than those posed by the lack of health care and illness, unaddressed. The intensity of that fear can be seen in the faces of our citizenry as it is stoked by conservatives who themselves fear a loss of an America that no longer looks like them and that can no longer guarantees privilege based upon that difference.
So, let’s understand that there is a great deal of fear and a great deal at stake for all of us in this debate. But let’s also agree that civil discourse is preferred and perfectly attuned with another of FDR’s four freedoms, the “freedom of speech”.
Though I may disagree with Mr. Mackey and I may be compelled to tune him out or shun him personally, I am not inclined to boycott his business. That seems to me to be akin to attempts at shutting down dialog and threatening those with whom we disagree. This sounds too similar to the uncivil tactics we’ve seen of late.
So, I share with Mr. Mackey the freedom to hold and express his opinion. In fact, I welcome it. Unlike much we have heard of late, at least it is reasoned, even though it is incorrect.
The health care debate is now being driven by a perverse nonsense feedback loop in which the Palin/Limbaugh crowd says all sorts of completely insane lies, gets a lot of ... how shall we put it, impressionable people totally jacked up over a bunch of complete nonsense, and then Fox brings one of them, Mike Sola, on the air to basically lose his mind on camera.I agree . . . I think. Does the latest infantile hissy fit by the birther/deather troglodytes represent a spectacular flame-out of crazy and the tiniest beginning of a renaissance of reason and reality-based thinking, or will the seemingly endless American capacity for sanctimonious stupidity prevail once again?
. . .
I don't think the Democrats have lost the message war because I see no evidence that even close to a majority of Americans believe completely preposterous things like this. But journalists have no capacity to deal with this stuff. In any sane civic discourse Sarah Palin's comments about 'death panels' would have permanently written her out of any public debate about anything. But even though very few people actually believe this stuff, the entire debate gets knocked off the rails by this sort of freak show which allows the organized interests who want to prevent reform to gain the upper hand.
Not that I'm necessarily pessimistic. I see some signs that this latest outburst of freakery may be starting to backfire on the GOP. We'll have to watch and see.

President Obama is traveling to New Hampshire today where he’s planning to hold a town hall meeting on health care. The meeting could be boisterous - members of Congress have been greeted with heated debates over the issue at their own town hall meetings.Ah, yes, those “debates” have certainly gotten “boisterous”, haven’t they?
I am having a hard time wrapping my mind around the fact that so many people think it's just dandy to carry weapons to these things, though. Apparently, it's a constitutional right to go to public political events, get red in the face and hysterically shout down everybody who doesn't agree with you while packing heat. From what I gather from all the apologists on TV, no American should be intimidated by this and there's no reason that anyone should feel this sort of thing keeps others from expressing their views.No, nothing at all. (Gawd, why are you libruls always so angry and shrill? It's just a boisterous debate, fercrissakes.) . . . and here's V, with the question of the day:
. . . But be advised anyway that if someone shows up with a gun strapped to his leg like he's Wyatt Earp* with a sign talking about revolution, you shouldn't feel that it's a dangerous environment and be intimidated. He's just expressing his views --- emphatically. Nothing to worry about.
"Why did your Dumb Broke Ass Bring a Gun to the Meeting?"

Boehlert goes inside the liberal blogosphere and provides the most definitive and extensive look at the netroots movement to date. Using the historic 2008 White House campaign as a backdrop, Boehlert also details how bloggers helped set the agenda -- a role once considered to be the exclusive province of the establishment Beltway press corps.Highly recommended.
Inspired by Timothy Crouse's landmark 1973 book, The Boys on the Bus, which unveiled modern campaign journalism at the time, Boehlert pulls back the online curtain and helps readers better understand the revolution that's taken place, as well as the unlikely participants who are leading it: students, housewives, attorneys, professors, musicians.
Bloggers on the Bus exposes the traditional press' outdated stereotypes about bloggers and leaves them by the roadside in order to paint a more complete portrait of this increasingly influential community.
(from Media Matters)
Meet America's New Celebrity 'It' Couple: Levi Johnston and Kathy GriffinUnfortunately, the pop culture awesomeness of Griffin's coup is tempered by Gawker's way-out-of-tune, over-the-top hateful snark on this one.
Well look who showed up holding hands on the red carpet at the Teen Choice Awards tonight! America's most ubiquitous fag-hag and the Alaskan cock-gangsta himself. It's love!
Of course, this is all just a publicity stunt. Griffin's a savvy, recently dumped publicity-whore and Levi's a painfully simple, recently-dumped publicity whore, so all of this makes perfect sense.
You really do have to wonder, at this point, if there’s ever a time when the average Gawker blogger says to himself, you know, I really am just a whiny, angry bitch, who just delights in inflicting verbal cruelty, and I appreciate the fun in being feted by other whiny, bitchy nothings who are so filled with bitterness over their utter failure to accomplish anything of meaning and value that they sit around and laugh along.A good reminder for all of us - moi included.
Particularly pathetic about Gawker the last year or so is all the nods to the simple fact that whatever amount of humor and wit was once a part of Gawker was long ago bleached out by the white heat of the bloggers’ burning envy, resentment, sexual frustration and impotence. Guess what, guys? Just because you’re “knowing” about how shitty and empty your blog has been for ages doesn’t actually make it any cooler or more forgivable that your pathetic little theater of cruelty has lost anything resembling bite, honesty or intelligence. It’s pretty simple, at the end of the day: you’ve elevated a kind of put-upon, entitled bitchiness to the status of fetish, but secretly, you’re smart enough to know that you’re just like every other asshole on the bus. (Don’t tell the commenters, or there goes the business model.) There’s nothing special about you, just like there’s nothing special about 99% of us. Most of us deal with it and get with a program of trying to make things just a bit easier for one another. Some of us tell dick jokes and pretend to be Oscar Wilde when we’re actually the Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons.Dang.
How do we cast that thing out from amongst our midst?? In this case, I'd say every molecule of Gawker snark is fully warranted. If that is what you really believe - that people in cities or suburbs, that minorities, that gays, that blacks and Hispanics are not part of "real America" - then of course, you are angry. You believe a fake America has taken over. You cannot understand this. So you start believing that we have a fascist/communist dictatorship, that there was some fraud allowing a non-citizen to become president, that the government is about to "take over" all healthcare provision ... and on and on. And no one is left in the GOP to challenge this, to calm it down, to present practical alternatives to the obvious crushing problems the country and the private sector have in paying for increasingly costly healthcare.
To me, this is a triumph of ideology. And conservatism is now an abstract anti-government ideology, fueled by cultural, racial and sexual resentment. This is a recipe for more violence, and more marginalization.






Once a year, spokespersons on behalf of the gay community are requested to explain why we insist on the pride parade; so here is the answer. There are those who fan the flames of hatred and homophobia, and the outcome may lead to gunfire. Here is your answer, this is the reason: Because they shoot at us. At times they use words, and other times they use bullets.That is by Shlomi Laufer, who continues:
Pride is not a grand street party for drag queens and guys wearing bathing suits; pride is a display of power by the community – it is a way to support teenagers and adults who feel the growing hatred on their flesh. The pride parade is a message to everyone who wishes to see us disappear that we are here and we are proud; we will support the victims of hatred, but we will not bow our heads. We will not hide.No indeed, we will not hide, and we will not bow our heads before murderers and fanatics!